led蜡烛灯代替普通灯泡效益效果对比表
比较指标 | 灯种 | 效果 |
40W白炽泡灯 | 3.0 LED-E14口蜡烛?/span> |
功率 | 40W | 3.0W | 节省92.5% |
省电(sh) | 供电(sh)局供电(sh)350.4?(q?/span> ·?(?/span> ?/span>×用电(sh)旉/天×电(sh)费?65? | 供电(sh)局供电(sh)Q?/span>26.28?(q?/span> ·?(功率×用电(sh)旉/天×电(sh)费?65? | ?/span>(节钱):224?(q?/span>·? |
光效与美观度 | 15lm/W,外观陋,发光即烫 | 100lm/W,l构严}Q外观精, 蒙沙|,无眩光,目前国际最好的LED球灯。R铝散热器不烫 | 整体更换后,提升了整个空间的照明质量 |
寿命 | 寿命Q?/span>1000?000h | 寿命Q?/span>50000h以上Q?8000h?/span>才{入光衰期 | 寿命提高25?0?/span> |
l护成本 | 10000h内:(x)需更换5?0只灯?/span> | 50000h内:(x)无需更换灯(5q?/span>内无需l护成本) | 省维护成本及(qing)人工成本(?/span>个灯泡每个生命周期可节约l?/span> 护成?/span>200?50? |
甉| | I?.43A | I?.13A | 甉|下降50%以上Q保护线路,不易引v火灾 |
显色?/span> | 90Ra | 95Ra | 显色指数接近Q且接近自然?/span> |
环保 | 有辐污?/span> | 采用LED光源无污染,不含?/span> | 实现真正l色环保节能减排低碳照明 |
功能特点 | 照度差、耗电(sh)大,人易疲劳、有?/span>视力Q维修量?/span> | 无频闪、无噪声、接q自然光?/span>功耗低Qh不易疲劳、有宜视力; 被照物显色性真实还原,便于安装?/span>质量E_Q维修量?/span> | 国际上先q的室内照明光源 |
售后 | 无保?/span> | 灯具保质Q光?/span>50000h,?sh)子?/span>?/span>3q?/span> | 质量E_Q有保障 |
http://mvpsportsbooks.com/